🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.